Logic Fallacies Strike Again

SERIOUSLY! ARE YOU KIDDIN’ ME!! #8 LOGIC FALLACIES STRIKE AGAIN! Isn’t This Person Supposed to Know Better? Asked to defend bogus fraud claims, Meadows flunks Logic 101. "There's no evidence of widespread voter fraud," Tapper said. "There's no evidence that there's not, either," Meadows responded. Um, no. Aug. 17, 2020, 6:20 AM PDT By Steve Benen https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/asked-defend-bogus-fraud-claims-meadows-flunks-logic-101-n1236914?fbclid=IwAR22dk7Bd9c6_c40ru0dZqUQK4iyGhoJTIDvC11XfFvS0qKLE0Mc5kvbXQk Donald Trump and his team haven't exactly been subtle in their campaign against mail-in voting, with the president and his allies throwing around baseless allegations of "fraud" for months. Yesterday, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows was offered a chance to defend the offensive. It didn't go well. Host Jake Tapper confronted Meadows on CNN's "State of the Union" about the White House's false claims regarding mail-in voting, pointing out that Trump himself requested a mail-in ballot this year. "There's no evidence of widespread voter fraud," Tapper said. "There's no evidence that there's not, either," Meadows responded. "That's the definition of fraud, Jake." Right off the bat, it's important to emphasize the degree to which the White House chief of staff flunked Logic 101. Let's say you came to my house and said, "Steve, there are ghosts in your basement." Naturally, I'd respond that this is ridiculous, noting that there's no apparitional evidence, prompting you to reply by arguing, "There's no evidence that there aren't ghosts in your basement, either." The absurdity should be obvious: those making outlandish claims have the burden of substantiating their claims, at least if they want to be taken seriously. It's not up to their rivals to disprove baseless nonsense. But in this case, there's no need to stop here. After Meadows effectively conceded that there is no evidence of widespread fraud, the former far-right congressman said there's "no evidence" to the contrary. Logical fallacies aside, the truth is there's all kinds of evidence proving that there's no widespread voter fraud. It's been examined and researched exhaustively for years. As for the White House chief of staff's assertion that the absence of evidence pointing to fraud is "the definition of fraud," maybe someone should get this guy a dictionary.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sec. of State Handles Calls for Help from Other States

On Behalf of WEA’s More Conservative Members #60 Examples of Sec. of State Wyman’s Media Appearances #3 - NBC - Coronavirus 'worst-case scenario': Could the presidential vote be done by mail? 3/26/2020 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/coronavirus-worst-case-scenario-could-presidential-vote-be-done-mail-n1168151 8.24.20 This series is in response to WA State Democratic Party Chairperson’s claiming Sec. of State Kim Wyman has not been “championing vote by mail across the country” . •Wyman said she's been inundated with calls from colleagues in other states seeking advice. •"The first thing I say is people need to understand the context," she said. "I am probably the biggest champion of vote by mail in the country, but it took us five years to move from polling places to vote-by-mail." •Every state that isn't used to voting primarily by mail will have to prepare for a huge increase in volume. •Voters need to be told not only how to v
Read more

ARE THE ATTACKS ON USPS AN ATTACK ON THE CONSTITUTION?

SERIOUSLY! ARE YOU KIDDIN’ ME!! #10 ARE THE ATTACKS ON USPS AN ATTACK ON THE CONSTITUTION? Aren’t These People Supposed to Know Better? 8.26.20 -The US Postal Service was created by an enabling act in the US Constitution. (Article I, Section 8, Clause 7). -Under the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution, election protocols are the responsibility of the States, subject to the US Constitution. (The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.) It is, therefore, my opinion that the recent actions taken by Pres. Trump’s recently appointed Postmaster General Louis DeJoy constitute a double assault on the US Constitution. Furthermore, the timing and targeting of mail sorting and delivery capabilities are clearly intended to disrupt the upcoming General Election and set the scene for a refusal by Pres. Trump to honor the results of the election, should he be defeated.
Read more

The Righteous US v. The Evil Them

Could This Be the Beginning of a Trend? #15 The Righteous US v. The Evil Them 7.8.20 There’s a great line, spoken by Ben Franklin, in the stage play/movie “1776”. I’m paraphrasing here, but it goes something like this…. “Revolution in the first person, our revolution, is always good. It’s only bad in the third person, their revolution.” As I look at the text of President Trump’s Mt. Rushmore speech, I see this concept in the form of an effort to emphasize an “US v. Them” scenario. On the Fourth of July, I would imagine a speech would emphasize the “WE”, but that does not seem to be the case. For example: "Our nation is witnessing a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values, and indoctrinate our children." To start with, I’m struck by the scenario of “our nation”, not theirs; the “our history”, not theirs; “our heroes”, not theirs; “our values”, not theirs; and “our children”, not theirs. It implies “they” are not p
Read more