In honor of that Constitution Day, I’m posting an article out of Florida and asking some questions about the Constitutionality of state efforts to support or oppose state constitutional amendments. Your thoughts, concerns, questions, and/or reactions are solicited. Issue: Is Florida’s use of police power to question signers of a petition to amend the state’s constitution appropriate and constitutional? Police are questioning Florida voters about signing an abortion rights ballot petition https://apnews.com/article/florida-abortion-ballot-amendment-elections-police-cfd4e3479498e63e65f1116acd95f7be?user_email=85a5e31f8cb9543141697042262e5f44096be2eb9e8745228d8b4349029af0da&utm_medium=Morning_Wire&utm_source=Sailthru_AP&utm_campaign=Morning%20Wire_10%20Sept_2024&utm_term=Morning%20Wire%20Subscribers AP reports the use of Florida’s new elections police to investigate Floridians who signed a petition, placing on the November ballot a constitutional amendment on abortion rights. More than 911,000 Florida voters signed the petition. “Mary Jane Arrington, a Democrat who has served as the Supervisor of Elections in Osceola County in central Florida for 16 years, told The Associated Press she had never received a request like this one before.” “Meanwhile, a state health care agency launched a new website last week targeting Amendment 4, with a landing page proclaiming that “Florida is Protecting Life” and warning “Don’t let the fear mongers lie to you.” “(Gov)DeSantis defended police visiting the homes of petition signers, and a separate move by a state health care agency to create a website targeting the ballot amendment, saying both are aimed at making sure November’s vote is fair.” Questions: 1] Does Florida’s use of police power to investigate signers of a petition infringe an Floridians’ Freedom of Speech? 2] Does the Florida state health care agency’s creation of a website opposing the amendment constitute an illegal use of state resources in support of an election issue? 3] Is DeSantis’s claim of “making sure November’s vote is fair” a reasonable assertion?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Federal Appeals court: Detroit students have a right to literacy

Constitutional Rights #1 Literacy Federal Appeals court: Detroit students have a right to literacy By Corey Williams | AP April 23, 2020 at 5:32 p.m. PDT https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/appeals-court-detroit-students-have-a-right-to-literacy/2020/04/23/0b35425c-85c3-11ea-81a3-9690c9881111_story.html WEST BLOOMFIELD, Mich. — Students at underperforming Detroit public schools have a constitutional right to literacy, a federal appeals court said Thursday in reviving a lawsuit against the state of Michigan. The court sent the case back to a federal judge in Detroit who had dismissed a lawsuit against state officials. The 2016 lawsuit alleged that the city’s public schools were in “slum-like conditions” and “functionally incapable of delivering access to literacy.” A basic minimum education should be recognized as a fundamental right, said judges Eric Clay and Jane Stranch in a 2-1 decision from the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The ruling came on the same day that gro
Read more

“Is Education Spending Constitutionally Protected?”

Liv Finne Washington Policy Center #5 “Is Education Spending Constitutionally Protected?” Liv: Given these stressful times, I hope you are well. You certainly seem back to your old self. Some comments on the content of this posting: Documentation You were very thorough in documenting the comment SPI Reykdal. However, I notice there are no further citations in the posting. So none of the assertions that followed are documented. I realize that you are writing for a very narrow audience, the faithful who follow WPC with little critical analysis. The absence of citations means nothing to them, but as I am also a follower of WPC, they mean a great deal to me. Without those citations, one is left to wonder about the accuracy of those assertions. For example, you state that, “The McCleary school funding case decided by the state supreme court in 2012 held that it is the legislature’s constitutional duty to define and fund the program of education.” The McCleary case was finally
Read more

The “Other Washington” Republicans

On Behalf of WEA’s More Conservative Members #29 The “Other Washington” Republicans Since I am an educator, the principle about education is closest to my heart. This principle was revised before Washington State passed its Charter Schools Initiative or resolved the McCleary case. “We value public education - Public-funded public education is a fundamental obligation of our society; it provides the civilizing glue that bonds together the large, diverse segments of our society and the skills necessary to realize its opportunities.” I find the statement about bonding “together the large, diverse segments of our society” particularly important, as it recognizes the existence of that great diversity. For me, however, the most important words are the first two: “Public-funded”. Actually, the motion that was made used the words “Publicly-funded”, which seems more grammatically correct. Since charter schools were not yet underway, the focus was public schools v. private schools. Wit
Read more