This message was sent to Liv Finne, Washington Policy Center's Education Director, today - May 24, 2021. Washington Policy Center’s 501C3 Status
“Nothing here should be construed as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any legislation before any legislative body.” (*)
https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/library/doclib/Finne-Governor-Inslee-Don-t-impose-divisive-and-harmful-CRT-on-our-schools.pdf Given that the Washington Policy Center has published extensive objections to one or more of the four bills that compose the Critical Race Theory legislation before the Legislature in the 2021 Session, the disclaimer statement that “Nothing here should be construed as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any legislation before any legislative body” (*) strains credibility. These appear on their face to be straight forward efforts to influence legislators’ votes and/or the governor’s signature. March 30, 2021 https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/sb-5044-5227-5228-to-require-mandatory-staff-attendance-at-critical-race-training-in-washingtons-k-12-public-schools-colleges-universities-and-medical-schools April 2, 2021 https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/committee-hearing-highlights-the-controversial-nature-of-mandatory-critical-race-training-bills April 6, 2021 https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/critical-race-training-bills-seek-to-lower-education-standards-and-require-teachers-to-judge-students-based-on-how-they-look-instead-of-who-they-are April 17, 2921 https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/governor-inslee-dont-impose-divisive-and-harmful-critical-race-theory-on-our-schools May 19, 2021 https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/state-superintendent-proposes-to-divert-funding-for-special-needs-children-to-critical-race-theory-type-programs May 21, 2021 https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/governor-inslee-dont-impose-divisive-and-harmful-critical-race-theory-on-our-schools-2

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Upholding the Constitution and Laws of the State of WA

On Behalf of WEA’s More Conservative Members #4 Why I’ve Decided to Support Kim Wyman, Despite WEA’s Failure to Endorse Her for a Third Time. 4.13.20 “The Secretary of State takes an oath of office to uphold the (US) Constitution and the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington to the best of her ability. It is imperative that the Secretary follow those laws without regard to personal preference or party affiliation, as adherence to the law is not optional.” Kim Wyman Kim Wyman has 26 years of experience as an election administrator and has overseen well over 100 elections. During those years, her administration has been known for its nonpartisanship in running elections and managing the offices. She does not take a stand on public issues, such as choice, gun control, same-sex marriage, taxation, minimum wage, or charter schools, that may or will come up for a vote. For that reason, voters see her and the office as being impartial. When Pres. Trump’s Elections Fraud Co...
Read more

Trump tweets distort truth on National Guard

Trump/Pence Fact Checks #1 AP FACT CHECK: Trump tweets distort truth on National Guard https://apnews.com/2ea05933a91212ccfb1a3ae4c39e0e79 9.1.20 WASHINGTON (AP) — It’s become a pattern when unrest flares in a city: President Donald Trump suggests he has National Guard troops ready to send to the scene and takes credit for dispatching them and restoring calm while he accuses Democrats of being squishy on law and order. That’s a distortion. Trump omits the fact that he is largely a bystander in National Guard deployments. While presidents can tap rarely used powers to use federal officers for local law enforcement, there is no National Guard with national reach for Trump to send around the country. And when violence broke out in Kenosha, Wisconsin, a week ago, Trump’s demand that National Guard troops be used came a day after the Democratic governor had already activated them. National Guard units in each state answer to the governor and sometimes state legislatures, not to the p...
Read more

Schools of Constitutional Interpretation/ Justice Barrett Pt. 2

Is Justice Barrett the Latest Shot in the “Deconstruction of Government” Pt. 2 / Schools of Constitutional Interpretation : Living Constitution; Originalism, Political Process theory; Purposivism; Textualism; & Strict Constructions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_constructionism / From the perspective of an observer, these six schools seem to be two groupings of three. Living Constitution, Political Process theory, & Purposivism in one group and Originalism, Textualism, & Strict Construction in the other. / The former seems to me to exist to make deciding the Constitutionality of a law easier and avoiding the lengthy task of pursuing a Constitutional Amendment. This makes change easier, which appeals to liberals. It also helps establish a body of precedent that can make future changes easier. / The latter seems to me to exist to make deciding the Constitutionality of a law more difficult and force the proponents of change into the lengthy tas...
Read more